Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://148.72.244.84/xmlui/handle/xmlui/4818
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmmar A Mohammed-
dc.contributor.authorMohamed A Al-karkhi-
dc.contributor.authorFiras A Al-Taie-
dc.contributor.authorImad Ahmed Lateef-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T15:53:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T15:53:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-
dc.identifier.citationDOI:https://doi.org/10.26505/DJM.18014740613en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN 2219-9764-
dc.identifier.issnOnline ISSN 2617-8982-
dc.identifier.urihttps://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm-
dc.identifier.urihttp://148.72.244.84:8080/xmlui/handle/xmlui/4818-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite of the advancement in surgery, surgical techniques and use of antibiotics prophylaxis, postoperative infections remain the commonest postoperative complications and one of the most frequently encountered nosocomial infections worldwide. These infections lead to increase morbidity with the attendant increase in cost of therapy. Objective: To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among the most common bacteria associated with postoperative wound infections. Patients and Methods: (126) swab specimens were cultured and isolates were identified by gram stain ,morphological and cultural characteristics of the colonies. The standard disc diffusion methods were done for determination of Antibiotics Resistance of all isolates as described by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI)16. Results: A total of (126) patients presented with infected wounds were enrolled in this study. Out of (126) patients studied (43)patient(34%) had no growth. While the others (83) patient (66%) had positive bacterial isolate. From those with positive isolates (47) patient(57%) were male and 36 (43%) were female.The common bacterial isolate were E.coli (29%) then Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter spp.(19%).Sensitivity testing show that E.coli had high resistance to Piperacillin, Aztreonam, Ticarcillin and Sulfamethoxazole. And Staphylococcus aureus had high resistance to Erythromycin and Sulfamethoxazole. Conclusion: The common pathogen was E.coli and it was resistant to the commonly used antibiotics. While Staph.aureus was still sensitive to many antibiotics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Diyala - College of Medicineen_US
dc.subjectBaqubahen_US
dc.subjectSurgical wounden_US
dc.subjectAntibiotics profileen_US
dc.titleCorrelation of Medical Treatment for Wound Infection with Isolated Bacteria and Antibiotics Sensitivity Profile in Baqubah Teaching Hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:مجلة ديالى الطبية / Diyala Journal of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-Ammar A. Mohammed.pdf512.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.